Reeling: “Shutter Island”
Posted on 03. Mar, 2010 by Jef in Film, Reeling
To all of you criticizing Martin Scorsese’s Shutter Island because you could see the “twist” ending an hour away: YOU NEED TO RELAX. The reason you saw the surprise coming was because it was hardly the film’s raison d’être. i.e. It wasn’t a surprise, Sherlock. This ain’t no post-The Sixth Sense bait-and-switch Shyamalan screw job. Part of the joy of Scorsese’s latest flick is figuring shit out way before Leonardo DiCaprio’s hard-boiled marshall Teddy Daniels does, and then watching him flounder around in a sad display of confidence and misplaced chutzpah.
Why else would Scorsese send Daniels feverishly up a squeaky spiral staircase in an homage to Hitchcock’s Vertigo? Like James Stewart’s doomed lover boy character Scottie, Daniels’s grip on things is furious but tenuous. The more he learns the less he knows. We watch him play detective and work his way up a symbol of enlightenment, a church in Vertigo, a lighthouse in Shutter Island — but by then we fully know he’s more in the dark than he cares to see. Scorsese, the tricksy imp, hasn’t hidden anything from us. We don’t just see the ball under the magician’s cup, we see the cup disappear and re-appear. And by the end he’s not even being coy anymore; he’s dazzling you with everything he has in his bag. He doesn’t care what you do or don’t know, the point is he’s got some shit he wants to show you.
Shutter Island is Scorsese doing what he doesn’t do very often: geeking out. Hitchcock isn’t the only reference to be enjoyed in this noir-ish pulpy genre-fest. The film’s marketing sold Daniels’s investigation of the breakout of Shutter Island’s most dangerous mental patient as a horror flick; one can see why — it’s the easiest angle and Scorsese spends a good deal of time crafting horror movie money shots — but there’s more to it than that. Mood is important here. It’s suffocating. It’s ALL mood. The biggest bait in the movie is that you expect it to be all plot — clues and conspiracies and tight character beats — but with the characters being more ciphers than anything the film floats on its sensualist waves. Memories are more important to Shutter Island than mind games. And what is memory anyway but the ultimate mind game?
The heart of the film is hidden beneath a layer of artifice that likely will alienate some viewers. It begins on a boat with a backdrop water effect (Hitchcock fans might get a stiff one), DiCaprio and Mark Ruffalo deliver lines like they drew a “Boston accent” card in an improv class, and Sir Ben Kingsley might as well be petting a black cat, evil and ominous as he is. The film’s hokeyness works though, in all the ways it is supposed to. It’s all brought to a head by DiCaprio’s final line, which unlike the “twist” is the film’s ultimate talking-point. The line haunts in a subtle way, its implications greater and more unsettling than all of the smoke and mirrors that preceded it.
Shutter Island doesn’t do anything new, but it does things I ADORE about movies in general, and this time done by Scorsese. Which is exactly all I was looking for. Call me crazy.




jessekg
Mar 3rd, 2010
Solid review Jef. I was going to see this last night but put it off until later this week. This makes me want to see it even more, critics be damned
Hannah
Mar 3rd, 2010
It’s funny – the “I could see that a mile away” was exactly my first reaction. I really did appreciate the movie – but I was disappointed because, like an idiot, I listened to those marketing people and I wanted to see a scary, twisty film. I was looking for the next great Sixth Sense and it definitely didn’t deliver on that front. But now I want to see it again.
I think you were bang on with your review, man.
Dust
Mar 3rd, 2010
I already guessed the ending based on the trailers, and figured that the twist wasn’t the point. So thanks for putting into words my feelings about this movie (even though I haven’t watched it yet).
-d
Jef
Mar 4th, 2010
Dust: Has your guess been confirmed already? If so, that is some great intuition on your part. I saw two big reveals possible, and it wasn’t only until about halfway through the movie that I felt one was more likely than the other.
jessekg
Mar 15th, 2010
Finally got around to seeing this and I definitely wasn’t disappointed. It had that classic, Hitchcock feel that you mention, but it made me remember that Scorcese also directed Cape Fear – another classic thriller that wasn’t very Scorcese-ey.
This felt like an ode to classic film making, and I didnt even think the ending was that predictable. While potentially less believable, I still thing it could have went another way. In fact, right up until the end I was still with Dicaprio, wishing it would go that other war for his character’s sake.
oh ya, plus I cant believe he dies in 9-11 at the end. Shit is crazy.